The brand new opinions of any age and another sex deceased against it
To have just one phrase – voluntagamus setting practically alternatives-unmarried in the Latin. However, We question whether or not you could ever fool around with a personally created term.
Adding a unique cure for address new kind of the fresh concern (money an expression, as opposed to in search of a current one):
Are you searching for “marriage-free”, pursuing the trends out of “child-free”? (I am aware that not most of the relationship trigger relationship, however, “relationship-free” is actually unclear IMO. In my opinion “marriage-free” create get the suggestion around the nevertheless.)
BTW, “child-free” has not yet cong choices for “no babies don’t want ’em” it’s farther together than simply whatever else, and therefore seems to be in identical general place.
One to it is possible to word Lesbian dating is actually “nonogamist”, shaped away from “nonogamy” in the same manner once the “bigamist” is formed from “bigamy”, otherwise “monogamist” regarding “monogamy”.
While the detailed on the -ist und bleibt entry from inside the wiktionary, suffix “-ist” can be “set in words to make nouns denoting . individual that employs a theory or system from trust.” Given that “nonogamy” relates to perhaps not ist und bleibt” was an individual who determines to not ever marry.
Note that “nonogamist” properly responses the initial matter expected, in the “somebody who [sic] has actually knowingly selected to keep unmarried for life”, but is perhaps not appropriate with respect to “relationships” mentioned in the revise. Perhaps “philononogamist”, that actually isn’t very difficult to express immediately after regarding the 14 seeks, perform suffice. Along with, keep in mind that those in new “nonogamy.livejournal community” can use “nonogamist” so you’re able to imply more or less what exactly is spelled in the fresh revision, however their incorporate can differ of more widespread usage.
The bill of address food regarding “nonogamy”, as a way to reveal that even though it seem to is not a fundamental dictionary keyword, it’s a term which is in use in the English language.
To possess an adult access to “nonogamy”, comprehend the Melbourne Punch book, web page 42, nine Feb 1871, reprinted for the Mr. Punch down under, 1982. Sadly mcdougal of these goods blogged Section XV in a brand of summary form, in lieu of during the over sentences; to laughter: “People believed out-of various other perspectives. . Expediency of not having one. . King Herod’s system mentioned approvingly. . The new author’s viewpoint. Wives. Polygamy, monogamy, nonogamy. Nonogamy required. Arguments in favour of polygamy. . Monogamy unhesitatingly destined. ” (Ellipses mine.) It seems within context you to definitely nonogamy form not partnered.
nonogamy.livejournal says, “This [nonogamy] neighborhood is for many of those you to roll our very own sight whenever we tune in to relationships stories. Many of those which do not feel we must getting coordinated off to getting happy. We don’t Hate like, but i would dislike people who wouldn’t shut-up about any of it already. Nonogamy ensures that we do not you prefer like, sex,cuddling, schedules, otherwise valentine’s cards. Like is well and you can a great, but end hold on it already.”
An exclusive and you will basically partnership that’s devoid of gender
Certain ignorati at the democraticunderground laugh the phrase, in lieu of providing they best obeisance, within the a thread titled “Midthread test: Really does “nonogamy” indicate no wives, nine spouses, or spouses who do “no-no”s?”.
Urbandictionary also offers a couple perhaps-ironic significance from nonogamy slightly at the potential with meanings a lot more than: 1. 2. Good sarcastic regard to progressive monogamy regarding build world where sex was marginalized otherwise disappears when you look at the a married relationship [. ]
I am scared you’ll not look for a currently based phrase with all brand new connotations and you can significance you require. I do believe celibate is the closest, because it’s really the only single-word-identity that always comes with the connotation of choice. The new downside to it is its inevitable reference to religion, and that i perceive that you’re not shopping for that meaning. So it suits to the very first around three of one’s standards.